MOVE ON AGC – WITHOUT FEAR OR FAVOUR, THE RAKYAT IS WATCHING

The future of Zahid’s representation letters to drop the 47 charges involving Yayasan Akalbudi has been sent to AGC and to be decided by AGC decision. Leave it to the AGC and their office bearers to do the necessary.  Rightfully they will need to investigate based on facts and evidence presented.  Needless to say, this must be done without fear or favor.  This episode must be left in the hands of AGC and MACC, no outside interference at all.  So therefore I appeal to members of AGC to do your best.

As this case is being watched earnestly by the Rakyat and the world, please do not delay the decision as it is paramount important to the State Elections around the bend plus to the Rakyat.

It will be the greatest joke in the world if AGC decides to drop the charges, so, therefore, please seriously consider the repercussions.  Let the law take its own course.  Rightfully, we should not interfere at all

 

God bless us – Malaysia and Malaysians. Amen.

“HUMBLENESS IS A GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL AND THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD”.

 

Tan Sri Datuk Robert Phang Miow Sin.
Justice of the Peace.        

 

Can ex­AG Gani challenge his sacking now?

Following the much­anticipated appearance of former attorney­general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail at last week’s International Malaysian Law Conference, one question has arisen, namely whether he could take legal action over his abrupt removal on July 28 last year.

Former Malaysian Bar president Kuthubul Zaman Bukhari, who was on the panel with the former AG, suggested that Gani take action over his sudden removal from being the top prosecutor in the country, and also who led the special task force comprising several agencies to investigate 1MDB.

Kuthubul opined there ought to be checks and balances following Gani’s sudden removal.

Gani himself, who was posed with the question, was not direct in his answer but said that unlike judges or the auditor-­general, the AG does not have security of tenure as it was up to the PM to remove the AG “at his whim”. However, Gani said he stands to be guided on this issue.

To challenge a decision by a person in authority can be done through a court by way of judicial review before the High Court.

It is the High Court who could grant an order of mandamus (to compel) or certiorari (to quash) an order. This follows as a civil servant requires a proper hearing before one is removed from office.

TAKING THE GOOD LORD FOR A RIDE (UPDATED WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

A couple of months back Malaysia Today showed pictures of A-G Gani Patail with Shahidan. In case you still have doubts, Malaysia Today will now show you how close they really are. They are so close that they deem it fit to seek atonement and go to God’s house in Mecca together

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Deep Throat Bukit Aman


RPK has always said that Malays are the worst lot of Muslims in the world. They take bribes, cheat, commit criminal breach of trust, plunder the nation’s wealth, and much more. They also rape, murder and even blow dead people up with military grade explosives.

And after doing all these evil deeds, they purport to repent and put on a public show of visiting God’s house in Mecca to seek forgiveness.

Yes, that is what they do. And they think that all their sins can be cleansed and that God will forgive them by that single act of being seen to be performing the Haj. I suppose it is that easy to take the Good Lord for a ride.

If you think it was bad enough that the former Chief Justice, Eusof Chin, and his wife, went on holidays with Lawyer VK Linggam. If you think it was revolting to see a picture of the arms of Correct, Correct, Correct Linggam on the shoulders of Eusof Chin while on holidays in New Zealand. Then you haven’t seen it all.

That indiscretion was good enough to warrant a Royal Commission of Enquiry to investigate the manipulations of Linggam in the appointments to the judiciary.

Malaysia Today has posted Parts 1 to 10 on the plundering of MAS, which resulted in a multi-billion hole in its fortunes. Malaysia Today has exposed that in the end it was the Director of the CCID, Dato’ Ramli Yusuff, and his lawyer, Rosli Dahlan, who were charged for relentlessly pursuing the case against MAS’s former Chairman, Tajuddin Ramli.

Until today Tajudin remains a free and wealthy man living in his ranch called Al Raudhah or The Garden of Heaven.

Malaysia Today has unravelled the link between Tajudin and A-G Gani Patail through the smooth operator who goes by the name of Shahidan Shafie.  Malaysia Today has provided the link between Shahidan’s adopted sister, Rizana Daud, who is married to Bistamam Ramli, Tajudin’s brother.

Malaysia Today has also provided the background of Shahidan — an ex-policeman who was charged for corruption in Johor Bahru.

Yet, today, he is the best of friends with A-G Gani Patail.

They say you must know how to choose your friends. Shahidan certainly does. What better friend can you have today in Malaysia, if you are a wheeler-dealer and underworld operator, than the Attorney General?

But then again with A-G Gani Patail he can be the best of friends with the highest bidder. He sells himself to whomsoever can satisfy his lust for money, money and more money. So that is what binds A-G Gani to corrupted former policeman Shahidan Shafiee, the riches that is thrown his way.

A couple of months back Malaysia Today showed pictures of A-G Gani Patail with Shahidan. In case you still have doubts, Malaysia Today will now show you how close they really are. They are so close that they deem it fit to seek atonement and go to God’s house in Mecca together. Or is this just another camouflage for the shenanigans that they are about to commit?

In this day and age, even a Holy place is not too sacred to hide deals that they are about to cut.

Did RPK not tell you that all the government agencies in Malaysia report to him? Now see this Tabung Haji list of Haj for this year.

Yes, A-G Gani, his wife, his son, and Shahidan, have gone for Haj together as a family. Right now, they are about to complete their Tawaf Wida’. This scumbag of an A-G knows no bounds. He will use his family as a camouflage for the evil things he does, even in the Holy Land.

In case you are still confused, let me explain this Haj list package as follows:

a) Kod Pakej PZ2 is the Zamrud package of 2 persons to a room;

b) The number 096 is the joint booking number. So Shahidan paid for the A-G and his family’s Haj trip;

c) The numerals 01-03 is the room arrangement.

So the A-G stays in one room with his wife and the A-G’s son, Faezul Adzra, stays in the other room with Shahidan. They are certainly family!

By the way, to ensure that he is safe after he retires, A-G Gani makes his son a Federal Counsel in the A-G Chambers. Talking about building a dynasty and taking care of his backside. And A-G Gani Patail is teaching his young government lawyer son that it is kosher to consort with criminals and wheeler-dealers so long as it is done secretly.

This scumbag A-G did not factor in that Malaysia Today will always find out his dirty deals.

Shahidan Shafie may think he is smoother than VK Linggam. But nothing escapes Malaysia Today.

Stay tuned and Malaysia Today will make more exposes on this scumbag A-G until a Royal Commission is set up to investigate the accusations that Datuk Mat Zain bin Ibrahim, the former Kuala Lumpur Officer-in-Charge of Criminal Investigations (KL OCCI), had said about A-G Gani Patail being protected by the MACC:

“It only shows that MACC and the Chambers are prepared even to go to the extent of affirming false affidavit to screen Gani Patail from legal punishment.”

I wonder whether they managed to con God into forgiving their sins. Maybe the infamous Perak Mufti can come out with a fatwah as to whether if you go for your Haj with dirty money your Haj will be Haj Mabruh or Haj Malboro.

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_05.html



Source : http://www.malaysia-today.net/taking-the-good-lord-for-a-ride/

AG’s statement on Bible-burning boggles the mind

The recent public statement by the Attorney-General giving his reasons for not prosecuting Ibrahim Ali for sedition has not in any way allayed the discontent of many people including even a cabinet minister.

They cannot understand, and rightly so, why this man is being protected from prosecution.

On the contrary the reasons given by the AG is nothing but mitigation for the man whose outburst was a call to Muslims in this country to commit a serious crime under the Penal Code.

If indeed the story given in the AG’s Statement is true that there was an attempt by a non-Muslim student to distribute Bibles to students including Muslim students, the AG should know very well that if the act constituted an offence, it was an offence by the student or students concerned.

The offence does not extend to the Bible or to the millions of people in Malaysia who use the Bible as their holy book.

Would not those millions of Christians be troubled and offended by the call of that man to seize and burn Bibles? 

Does not such a call constitute a “seditious tendency… to promote ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Sedition Act?

It was reported in a news portal on October 27 that Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said, “It is up to the Attorney-General. 

My personal opinion is when one says they want to burn the holy book of another, that is seditious.”

The AG gave two reasons why he chose not to prosecute Ibrahim. One was that, taken in its overall context, the man’s call to seize and burn Bibles did not have a seditious tendency.

The other was that the man had “no intention to offend or to provoke”. Both those reasons are flawed in law because they are not defences recognised by the Sedition Act.

On the contrary Section 3(3) of the Act has made it abundantly clear that “intention” (however good) of the person uttering the statement, is irrelevant if the statement has a seditious tendency.

It boggles my mind how the AG could excuse the man on grounds of his good intention when the law says otherwise.

It also boggles my mind how burning the Bible would defend the sanctity of the Islamic religion.

In such a prima facie blatant case of sedition as this, the AG would have done well to let the court decide if Ibrahim was entitled to the defence of “context” and “intention” as given by him.

Now, what about the many others who in a swoop, were recently charged for sedition? 

Were the considerations of “context” and “intention”, even though not valid considerations, not applied to them also before they were charged?

I think not.

Stanley Isaacs is the former Head of Prosecution, Attorney-General’s Chambers Malaysia.

Source : http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/highlight/2014/10/31/ags-statement-on-bible-burning-boggles-the-mind/

Ex-chief prosecutor slams AGC's ‘burn bible’ reply

The justifications given by the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) for not prosecuting Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali over his threat to burn bibles does not hold water, said a former AGC prosecution chief.

Stanley Isaac, who was AGC head of prosecution, said that the reasoning that the call had no seditious tendency or that Ibrahim had no intention to provoke are “flawed in law”.

He said that Section 3(3) of the Sedition Act makes it clear that intention is “irrelevant” if the statement has seditious tendency.

“It boggles my mind how the AG could excuse the man on grounds of his good intention when the law says otherwise.

“It also boggles my mind how burning the bible would defend the sancity of the Islamic religion,” he said in an email to Malaysiakini.

Isaac said that with the prima facie “blatant” in this case, Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail (left)should have let the court decide if Ibrahim’s defence of “context” and “intention” stands.

He added that reasons given were just “mitigation” and not reasons not to prosecute.

Further, he said, clearing Ibrahim because of these two factors also calls to question the other sedition charges, where context and intention were not considered.

The AGC had justified not charging Ibrahim for threatening to burn the Malay-language Bible by saying he did not intend to cause disharmony and was only defending Islam.

It also noted that Ibrahim had said this in response to claims that Muslim students at a school in Penang were given the holy books.

In his own defence, Ibrahim said he was only making the call to burn the holy books to Muslim parents’ whose children were given the bibles.

Meanwhile, Isaac said Ibrahim’s call is a call to Muslims to “commit a serious crime under the Penal Code”.

Even if the claim of distribution of bibles to Muslim student is true, he said, the offence lies with the distributor of the books and not the books themselves or others who use the book for their worship.

“Would not those millions of Christians be troubled and offended by the call of that man to seize and burn bibles?

“Does such a call not constitute a "seditious tendency to promote ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia" within the meaning of Section 3 of the Sedition Act?” asked Isaac.

Source : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/279082

 

Silence 'not an option', ex-AG Abu Talib tells Gani

Former attorney-general Abu Talib Othman is urging his successor Abdul Gani Patail to answer allegations against him over the Pulau Batu Puteh debacle.

“To me, he has no choice but to speak up to defend himself and his office.

“For this purpose perhaps, it will be relevant if I were to quote the words of Lord Denning, ‘Silence is not an option when things are ill done’,” Abu Talib (right) told Malaysiakini today.

He was commenting on former police CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim’s statutory declaration on the Pulau Batu Puteh territorial dispute with Singapore.

The dispute was heard by the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the court in May 2008 ruled in Singapore’s favour.

Mat Zain had claimed that Gani, who led Malaysia’s legal team, had tendered a doctored photograph of Pulau Batu Puteh, taken from an anonymous blog, as evidence.

He said this was caught out and had undermined the credibility of Malaysia’s legal team in the eyes of the bench of 16 judges.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri has denied that Gani was involved in submitting the photograph that inaccurately portrayed the island’s position relative to the coast of Johor.

However, Gani himself has thus far remained silent on the allegation.

 

 

Source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/247851

Police still investigating book on the attorney-general

The police are still investigating the book written about attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail titled Tan Sri Gani Patail: Pemalsu, Penipu, Penjenayah (Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail: Fraud, Liar, Criminal).

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Abdul Aziz said this in a written reply in Parliament to Ipoh Timor MP Lim Kit Siang,

Lim had also asked about the status of the graft investigations against Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud and Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman being carried out by the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission.

Prior to this, Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai, who is also DAP disciplinary committee chairperson, had also asked the speaker about the status of the investigations on Gani.

However Tan's question was turned down under Standing Order 23(1)( c) 'as it contains argument, interference, opinion, imputation, epithet or misleading, ironical or offensive expression, frivolous or seeking answers on trivial matters'.

It was reported that former MACC advisory panel member Robert Phang had in August lodged a police report about the book, which was written and published by lawyer Zainal Abidin Ahmad.

PM has to explain actions taken

Lim said he had specifically called on the prime minister to give Parliament and the country an explanation on actions taken against the Gani, Taib and Musa.

He said Nazri's reply on Taib was also similar: that the allegations of corruption against the Sarawak chief minister were still under investigation as it required evidence that would be beyond reasonable doubt.

"The investigations into the case are on the basis of the offence and require statements from witnesses, documents and other evidence," Lim said in a statement today.

He said he had questioned the government's efforts in fighting corruption as this was one of the six National Key Result Areas (NKRA) of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's Government Transformation Programme (GTP).

The level of corruption in the country, Lim pointed out, had gone from bad to worse over the past three years, as reported by Transparency International in its latest annual Corruption Perception Index.

Source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/211988

Experts: MACC's procedures flawed, not the law

Legal experts have disagreed with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's (MACC) assessment that some laws should be amended before it can be more effective in nabbing top corrupt politicians.

On Wednesday, Kubang Kerian MP Salahuddin Ayub, a member of the parliamentary select committee (PSC) on corruption, revealed that the MACC had argued it was hampered by "archaic provisions" in existing laws.

Salahuddin (left) had cited a case raised by the MACC to the PSC in which a wealthy state leader could not be prosecuted because of flaws in the law, despite six investigation papers being opened on the said individual.

Among others, Salahuddin said that the MACC had told the PSC that it wanted section 23 and 50 (see below) of the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 amended.

Senior lawyer Baljit Singh Sidhu, who also teaches law, disagreed with the need for amendments in the two sections.

"In fact, section 23 is taken from, and similar to, the Hong Kong law. Hence, I do not understand why the MACC is claiming the law is archaic, whereas it had only been recently legislated (three years ago).

"Furthermore, you have the Prevention of Corruption Act 1997 provisions under the Penal Code and the Emergency Order. What other legislation does the MACC need?" he told Malaysiakini.

Cheras MP not allowed to query AG's 'misconduct'

Dewan Rakyat speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia has rejected a parliamentary question from DAP’s Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai on the status of police investigations into allegations of professional misconduct by Attorney-General (AG) Abdul Gani Patail.

Tan, who is also DAP national vice-chairperson, had submitted a question as to the outcome of investigations into the book, ‘Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail Pemalsu, Penipu dan Penjenayah’.

Parliament secretary Roosme Hamzah wrote to Tan explaining that the question has been rejected under Standing Order 23(1)( c) ‘as it contains argument, interference, opinion, imputation, epithet or misleading, ironical or offensive expression, frivolous or seeking answers on trivial matters’.

A copy of the letter dated Sept 21 was made available to Malaysiakini.

Former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission advisory panel member Robert Phang had last month lodged a police report about the book, written and self-published by lawyer Zainal Abidin Ahmad.

Phang had also challenged the police and Gani to respond the accusations and to sue the author for defamation if these are false.

“The AG must seriously address the issue made in the public domain and should not be a liability to the government,” he said.

Phang, who was questioned for two hours following the report, told Gani not to be a stumbling block to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's reforms.

Source : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/209920

Have Tribunal To Address Allegations Made Against Gani

Malaysiakini reported on Friday that outspoken former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) panel member Robert Phang has been cleared of the corruption allegations made against him.This follows the confirmation by the MACC director of investigations Mustafar Ali in an SMS in response to a query from Malaysiakini.

Phang had been issued with a letter from Mustafar, dated November last year, clearing him of the allegation made by an anonymous blogger.However, the letter from the MACC that cleared Phang also stated that it cannot be used for the purpose of publication by the media.

The MACC Chief Commissioner Abu Kassim Mohamed should be censured in Parliament if he cannot give satisfactory explanation why MACC suppressed information for some 15 months that Phang had been cleared of corruption allegations made against him.

In this connection, the Chairman of the MACC’s Operations Review Panel, Hadenan Abdul Jalil should also explain why he withheld information about Phang being cleared of corruption allegations some 15 months ago in May last year.