Showing posts with label Dong Zong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dong Zong. Show all posts

26 Dec 2019

吁请董教总暂缓华团大集会与政府接头对话


新闻稿 请即刻发布

社会爱心基金会主席丹斯里拿督彭茂燊太平局绅

吁请董教总暂缓华团大集会与政府接头对话

华文及淡米尔文小学爪夷文课题已触动民族间的敏感神经,并已近乎进入对峙的阶段,只差还没进入剑拔弩张的状况,因此各方都应该保持谨慎,为免爆发实质的冲突,或避免有心人趁机利用这局势捞取政治资本,将社会和国家推向更困难的局面。

身为一位关心社会和谐的人士,我在此吁请董教总暂缓他们的集会,寻求与政府接头对话,寻求更理性的解决方案。

我相信,政府不会高傲的态度把董教总拒于门外,如果需要的话,我也希望能够出一份绵力,尽力协助撮合这次的对话,以达到双赢的局面,维持社会的和谐。

如果我们冷静观察事态的发展,也不难发现有许多组织,包括政治利益团体正蠢蠢欲动,伺机借助这个大集会捞取政治利益,一旦政治利益团体得势,发动任何反种族行动或反教育政策活动,都不会给任何族群带来好处,反而会让整个国家陷入囧境

目前国家迫切需要的是搞好经济,因此政府需要把精神集中于搞好经济增长,解决民生的问题。

我认为,教育问题宜用温和的对话方式解决。我们固然有反对的权力,但并不是不顾一切的搞群众对抗,使到整个局面无法挽回。

我要强调的是,暂缓并不是退缩,而是经过审时度势,掌握时势与状况的变化,采取了适当的策略。#

6 Jul 2015

‘Only students of Du Zhong allowed to sit for UEC’

KUCHING: Former magistrate and veteran counsel Chong Siew Chiang believes that Kuantan Chong Hwa High School (Guan Zhong) is not a Chinese independent school (Du Zhong) based on the letter of approval; hence, its students are not eligible to sit for the internal examination to acquire Unified Examination Certificate (UEC).

He pointed out that having a non-Du Zhong students sitting for UEC would be an infringement of Section 69 of Education Act 1996.

“Any individual who contravenes the Section should be guilty of an offence and upon conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year,” he said, adding that such offence would even result in UEC being declared invalid and the school concerned slapped with a closure order.

Chong made these remarks during a seminar on the recent leadership crisis of United Chinese School Committees Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong), organised by Kuching Si Ho Lim Clan Association, at Crown Square here on Friday night.

The letter of approval for Guan Zhong that decides its status has been cited as the initial incident that leads to a spate of unpleasant internal conflicts within the Dong Zong.

Chong asserted this was the reason why Dong Zong chairman Dr Yap Sin Tian and its deputy chairman Chow Siew Hon insisted on adhering to the law and the association’s constitution, rather than risking any Du Zhong being transformed.

“The letter of approval clearly states that the teaching medium for Guan Zhong is Bahasa Melayu (BM). This is totally different from Du Zhong whereby BM is just a subject.

“As stipulated under the Education Act 1996, the government defines UEC as an internal examination. Besides, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, who is a former education minister, in a Parliament reply dated Dec 18, 1995, said the current 60 Du Zhong in the country should remain status quo under the Education Act 1961, and that only students of Du Zhong are allowed to take UEC examination.”

On another camp challenging and aiming to topple Yap and Chow, Chong said this group failed to observe and abide by the association’s constitution 5(2)(3), 5(3)(1) and 5(a)(9).

According to the said constitution, he said the Central Committee (CC) line-up would have to be agreed on and formed before the election of members for the Central Executive Committee (CEC).

“On Dec 7, 2014, this camp refused to attend a meeting aimed at discussing matters on Guan Zhong. Later, they called for a meeting in the absence of Yap to come up with a new CEC leadership – with the aim of toppling Yap.

“This is the ‘law of jungle’ which we shall no longer use. Moreover, toppling is not gentlemanly. Yap was elected chairman according to the rules of the association, but the so-called new chairman of the new CEC was not elected according to the rules.”

Chong stressed that the association’s constitution ‘is the contract binding all members of the association’.

“In the recent case of Dong Zong, it has become crystal clear which camp was challenging and going against the rules.”

On the arguments by some quarters that the current 60 Du Zhong that were without letters of approval – making them no different from Guan Zhong – Chong dismissed such statement as ‘ignorant’.

“The said letter of approval comes into effect following the enactment of Education Act 1996. Prior to that, the requirement of such letter of approval did not exist. However, the 60 Du Zhong do hold a permit.

“What I have laid out is based on facts and the perspective of the law. As a lawyer who has been in practice for 49 years, not even the judge in court could dismiss my statements – yet there are quarters out there judging me left and right.”

Chong said although the Malaysian government did not recognise UEC, some 600 universities worldwide would accept UEC holders into their institutions.

“UEC is widely recognised by many renowned universities including those in Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, China, the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.”

Meanwhile, Yap hit out at Dong Zong secretary-general Poh Chin Chuan, who was responsible for submitting another CEC line-up to the Registrar of Societies (ROS) – a move, if not withdrawn in due time, might lead to the de-registration of Dong Zong.

He said it was evident that Poh and his camp would stop at nothing to achieve their agenda. He thus announced some measures to ‘save Dong Zong’.

“Firstly, Poh and his camp must withdraw and cancel the illegitimate CEC line-up so that ROS would not have two lists of leaderships. Secondly, they must not abuse the power and submit an illegitimate list to ROS since they have access to the passcode.

“Thirdly, their act of producing illegitimate CEC line-up has been branded as contempt of law. They have already been dragged to court and a verdict can soon be expected. Once convicted, there will be consequences.

“And lastly, Poh and his camp have been infringing the rules to induce a series of crises in order to wrest power – people could not help but ask whether such a secretary-general should be retained in Dong Zong.”




Source : http://www.theborneopost.com/2015/07/05/only-students-of-du-zhong-allowed-to-sit-for-uec/#ixzz3f5nlUdBp

25 Jun 2015

Dong Zong's Story

NOTHING like this has ever happened in the history of the Chinese education movement.
There have been fist fights, frozen bank accounts, heart attacks, lawsuits and, most embarrassing of all, a terrible loss of face for the Chinese community.
That is the situation in Dong Zong, the Chinese education body that was once the most influential opinion-shaper among the Chinese-educated.
It used to be so powerful that it could bring down Chinese politicians and even ministers. Today it is the laughing stock as the feud between two factions grows more acrimonious.
The Chinese vernacular press devote up to a full page of news daily to the never-ending hostilities. But the power struggle has become so complicated and dragged on for so long that many people have lost hope that there will ever be a solution.
To put it simply, the dispute is between the group aligned to Dong Zong’s most controversial president Yap Sin Tian and the reformist group aligned to the secretary-general Poh Chin Chuan. They are fighting for control of Dong Zong with both sides claiming to have the Chinese interest at heart.
There was supposed to have been light at the end of the tunnel last week when the reformists managed to convene a meeting to elect a new central executive committee (CEC) as ordered by the High Court.
Yap claimed he had a heart attack and did not attend the meeting which was preceded by a free-for-all between supporters of the two camps. Despite the fracas, a new president Tan Kai Kim was elected to replace Yap.

2 Oct 2014

捍卫华校,华人有责,速为关中正名正身



彭茂燊:捍卫华校,华人有责,速为关中正名正身
社会爱心基金会主席丹斯里彭茂燊文告
新闻稿,请即发布,谢谢
2014102

社会爱心基金会主席丹斯里彭茂燊促请董总召开全国华团大会, 反映华社要求政府修正关丹中华中学批文及学校注册证的广大民意,使它成为一所华文独中,让其学生能够参加华文独中统考。

彭茂燊劝请华总总会长兼关中董事长丹斯里方天兴,积极配合董总召开华团大会的努力,要求政府就关中地位及统考问题给全体华社一个明确的交待,而不是没有法律保障及没有约束力的所谓“口头承诺”。华总和关中董事会应与董总站在同一阵线向政府据理力争。

彭茂燊表示,教育总监918日致彭亨董联会的公函,其实是重复2012726日关中批文内容,没有任何的修改。关中批文和教育总监公函,完全没有提到魏家祥所声称的“关中可以考政府考试以外的考试”字眼,那是魏家祥把自己的话强塞进教育总监的口里,再次严重误导华社。

彭茂燊指出,教育部在公布的2013年和2014年教育统计报告里,明确指出彭亨州没有华文独中,再次强调全国只有60所华文独中;教育部不承认关丹中华中学为一所华文独中。他表示, 魏家祥、方天兴及教总主席王超群,一开始就把关中这所私立中学包装成“华文独中”,把华社欺骗得好苦。如今纸纸包不住火,现在就看他们如何善后向华社交待。

彭茂燊指出,关中批文是魏家祥担任副教育部长时拟定的,魏家祥必须承认犯下此严重错误,公开向华社道歉,不应继续推卸责任。

彭茂燊表示,马华要华裔选票回流其实很简单,就看他们愿不愿意或能不能够说服当权者给华社一个更公平的待遇,将功赎罪,关中课题可以是马华翻身的良机,也可能是它继续沉沦的险滩。

他指出,如果当官的马华部长在朝办不到或不愿做,那么就由民间团体向政府集体继续争取,要求政府修正关中批文及学校注册证。

他表示,董总为华教斗争几十年,坚持捍卫母语教育的总方针,主席叶新田和署理主席邹寿汉的立场也非常明确及坚定,在2012520日发动关丹申办华文独中和平请愿大会,以及同年926日发动游行到国会的华教救亡运动,向首相呈函要求解决的八项诉求, 其中第4项就是要求修正关中批文,以符合华文独中的体制。方天兴指董总排斥关中的言论是不能够成立的。

他强调:“如果方天兴真正是为了关中学生的前途着想,他别无抉择,惟有坚决向政府要求明文批示准予统考;如果他真心是为了捍卫华教, 他也别无他法,必须配合董总以及华社广大群众及社团,共同向政府要求修改关中批文及学校注册证。”

24 Sept 2014

关中课题文告草案




社会爱心基金会主席丹斯彭茂燊的文告。请笑纳。谢谢。

关中课题文告草案



华总大会在总会长兼关丹中华中学董事长丹斯里方天兴的主持下, 通过〝吁请董教总独中工委会让关丹中华报考统考〞的提案, 明显是在误导华社, 让华社以为董教总存心不让关中考统考, 企图把关中批文的后遗症推给董教总。

董总兼董教总独中工委会主席叶新田博士已多次清楚说明, 统考是政府所规定的华文独中内部考试, 教育法令第69条阐明, 内部考试未获考试总监批准是不允任何其他学生报考。

叶新田也进一步表明, 关中可以通过2种方式参与统考, 那就是1: 修正注册批文成为一所名符其实的华文独中, 2: 请政府发出一封允许关中报考统考的公函, 只要符合任何一项, 参与统考就没有问题。

本人也曾多次发出建言, 促请方天兴正本清源, 要求政府从速修改批文, 让关中成为一所真正的华文独中, 则一切问题都可迎刃而解, 不必把整个华社搞到几乎天翻地复。

众所周知, 根据批文, 关中是一所不折不扣的私立国中,强制采用国中课程及报考政府考试, 董事长方天兴所谓采用吉隆坡中华独中双轨制的说法乃自欺欺人, 因为从申办开始, 这所中学就从隆中华关丹分校的名义, 被偷天换日改为一所变种独中。

更何况, 隆中华的双轨制在原则上是以统考为主, 政府考试为辅, 而关丹中华在原则上则是以政府考试为必考, 统考至今尚无定论, 请问这是那一门子的双轨制?

方天兴在华总大会不敢通过提案吁请政府修改关中批文, 甚至不敢促请教育部发出统考准函, 反而舍本逐末, 把矛头对准董教总, 迫使董教总违反教育法令让关中报考统考, 这种做法跟他口口声声维护华社权益, 向首相反映华社问题视为本份的言论, 根本就是背道而驰, 违心之论。

本人坚决认为, 董教总维护华教的斗争, 绝对应该而且向来也是建立在合情、合理及合法的基础上, 才能走到今天, 独中工委会是不应该在没有法律的保障下, 单凭一些人的所谓口头承诺, 而允许关中统考, 如果有那些成员不够警惕违反了这项原则, 导致华教堡垒被单元化教育政策的同路人里应外合攻破缺口, 那就难免成为民族罪人了。

本人严正提醒单元化教育路线的同路人, , 董总基层维护华教的力量不可轻视, 华社草根重视母语教育的精神不可轻侮, 收手吧, 切勿藉关中课题搞到鸡犬不宁。