14 May 2012

Najib makes two-day working visit to London


9 May 2012

Malaysia Bina Kenderaan Penyelamat Pelbagai Guna Pertama Seumpamanya

Klang , 8 Mei ( Bernama ) -- Kenderaan Penyelamat Pelbagai Guna yang dibangunkan Malaysia (MRV) , pertama seumpamanya di dunia , dan berkeupayaan menjalankan misi penyelamat kritikal , dilancarkan di sini.

Unit itu yang dilengkapi keupayaan memaamkan kebakaran m dibangunkan khusus untuk  menagangi keadaan teruk seperti banjir, tsunami , gempa bumi dan boleh melalui muka bumi sukar , jika berlaku bencana.

MRV yang dikeluarkan oleh LWK Automotive Green Technologies Sdn Bhd (LWK Green), dibina menggunakan Sistem Pacuan Kuasa Haidraulik (HPDS) , mampu menjimatkan penggunaan tenaga sehingga 20kw menggunakan generator.

Kenderaan itu boleh dipandu pada cerun 45 darjah , rupa bumi berbukit , berlumpur , licin dan jalan buruk , selain  boleh tenggelam dalam air sedalam  enam kaki.

Menteri  Sains , Teknologi dan Inovasi Datuk Seri Panglima Dr Maximus Ongkili dalam ucapan pada pelancaran itu berkata MRV itu dibina menerusi geran kementerian berjumlah RM 2.2 juta. Teks ucapan beliau dibacakan oleh Timbalan Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Datuk Dr Sharifah Zarah Syed Ahmad.


Source : Bernama

7 May 2012

彭茂燊抨魏家祥處理師資 “大事辦不了,小事不敢辦”

(吉隆坡3日訊)愛心基金會主席丹斯里彭茂燊抨擊教育部副部長拿督魏家祥,在處理華校師資問題課題上“大事辦不了,小事不敢辦”,在柔州教育局前助理主任李翊獅秋后算賬事件上,應盡力協助處理,勿以行政為由推卸責任。

“在維護華教課題上,魏家祥應當與董教總誠意合作,共同傳承中華文化,不是採取推三阻四的態度,更不應該費神干擾和斷絕董教總獲取任何關于華教發展的資訊。”

他讚揚李翊獅為華教獻身的精神,反觀魏家祥心口不一致。自325華教大集會后,他一再宣稱本身險被打,卻一直沒糾正報章指他被打的報導不實,之后有人出來指証后才辯白,引起華社質疑他的人格和誠信。

正如魏家祥所說“真的假不了,假的真不了”,坦若他是坦蕩蕩,應該是沒什麼好怕的。
他奉勸魏家祥,認真和誠心誠意協助解決華教問題。

2 May 2012

World Press Freedom Day

On this auspicious occasion for the week of World Press Freedom Day, I wish to put on record that this divine liberty, governed by human rights and that all human being should respect and practice this true spirit.

Not only for World Press Freedom but freedom of speech. It would be deplorable if access to independent and important news was being prevented in anyway. We should strongly condemn any blocking of the trusted news that has been broadcast around the world including via distribution partners.

A word of advice and suggestion to our local media organization that they should not be duly influenced by any party or individuals so as to unnecessary sensor or delete whatever news which is to be shared by entire world. Malaysia is definitely under the watch and scrutiny of worldwide independent news agencies again, plus human right organization and also the United Nations. Please avoid from making Malaysia as a laughing stock in this respect.

We pray, God will continue to bless and guide our leaders to be very much aware of the importance of freedom of speech and world press freedom especially during this World Press Freedom Day.

Please respect and support the journalist and reporters.

God Bless.

6 Apr 2012

Teoh Beng Hock's death: AG 'highly irresponsible'

5 Apr 2012

Phang: Nazri's comments on MACC below the belt

Nazri, are you protecting the A-G because he didn't prosecute your son

Below is my article posted in Malaysia-Chronicle.com and comments from readers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minister in Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz has no business to interfere in MACC’s investigations. Do not hit below the belt of the officers as they do not have the recourse to rebut you – STOP BEING A BULLY.

The de facto law minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz has no business interfering in Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)’s investigations. Nazri is just a parliamentarian and a Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of Parliament’s administration and also to coordinate parliamentary affairs.

His job is to kick the butts in Parliament, not use political powers to bully MACC officials who have the courage to fight corruption. Nazri has no standing to tell MACC deputy chief Shukri Abdull how to run or manage anti-corruption cases and to belittle him as “weak”.

Is not MACC supposed to be independent?

Has Nazri forgotten that the MACC is, supposedly, independent? In fact, Shukri is “strong and brave” to expose Attorney-General (A-G) Tan Sri Gani Patail’s reluctance to prosecute the many MACC cases it investigated against those who hold high public office. Shukri should not be discouraged or intimidated by Nazri’s bullying ways. He should, instead, start investigating Nazri’s assets to determine whether his income can support his and his son’s lavish lifestyle.

Why is Nazri defending the attorney-general and attacking the MACC? Both are supposed to be independent. Well, if Shukri is weak, then the AG is most definitely lame if he requires Nazri to defend him.

Disgusting and disgraceful 

This is again a classic example of interference by the executive in the affairs of the MACC. The attorney-general has been cited for corruption and breach of ethics umpteenth times and no one has dared act on him. How powerful can the AG be?

Nazri explained that corruption charges would cause great shame to the accused and therefore the A-G’s Chambers must act diligently, and charge the accused in court only if there is concrete evidence. Just like they did to ex-CCID (Commercial Crimes Investigation Department) chief Ramli Yusuff and his men?

Nazri’s attitude disgraces the Prime Minister’s office by using threats against senior civil servants who have the courage to act, especially against graft by those who hold high public office.

Nazri is also defending the alleged collusion between former Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan and a serving A-G to victimise police officers and the apparent influence of an underworld figure in the promotions of police officers. It is definitely not Nazri’s business to chastise Shukri for lamenting that the A-G’s chambers had refused to charge graft suspects investigated by the commission.

Why is Nazri defending the A-G?

Malaysians are now asking whether Nazri is protecting the A-G’s chambers just because the A-G is under his portfolio or is it because of other reasons? 'Is Nazri protecting the attorney-general because the AG is under his portfolio, or is it because of other reasons?'

Why is Nazri defending the A-G and attacking the MACC? Both are supposed to be independent and is another classic example of interference by the executive into the affairs of the MACC.

The A-G has been cited for corruption and breach of ethics umpteenth times but no one has dared act on him. How powerful can the A-G be? The MACC should seize the opportunity to show Nazri’s its muscles by revealing all the high-profile cases referred to the A-G but not prosecuted.

Share