KUALA LUMPUR HIGH COURT Civil Suit No: S-23-9-2010
Datuk Ir. Dr. Wee Ka Siong …….Plaintiff
Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin & Anor …….Defendant.
To all the supporters who have been upholding the truth, justice and righteousness. More so to the episode that I was involved in, by a suit taken by Datuk Ir. Wee Ka Siong against me.
I append below the facts stated on record by the Learned High Court Judge, YA Dato’ Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad on the 2nd of July 2013, which is a follows:-
1. The consent judgement does not state an apology to be given to Wee Ka Siong by me as I have flatly rejected such suggestions by him.
2. Was without admission of liability by me.
3. There was no order as to cost.
4. Wee Ka Siong has no liberty to file afresh on the similar issue against me.
In short, Wee Ka Siong failed in his suit against me. In his press statement carried by The Star newspaper, which carried a story portraying and implying that I had apologised to him. - contrary to what was reported, I can say: That I merely express “REGRET” that Wee Ka Siong has misunderstood my various statements made over in the press as follows:-
In conclusion and looking back Wee Ka Siong should be grateful to me because I had invited him to come forward to explain to MACC and PDRM in the investigation of PKFZ issue. As a result, he was subsequently interviewed by MACC where MACC probe finds no proof of malpractice by Wee Ka Siong.
Please read with your open mind and for sure, at best, Wee Ka Siong can claim only a phyrrhic victory. One will have to ask where is the victory for Wee Ka Siong and where is the apology for Wee Ka Siong from Robert Phang.
Datuk Ir. Dr. Wee Ka Siong …….Plaintiff
Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin & Anor …….Defendant.
To all the supporters who have been upholding the truth, justice and righteousness. More so to the episode that I was involved in, by a suit taken by Datuk Ir. Wee Ka Siong against me.
I append below the facts stated on record by the Learned High Court Judge, YA Dato’ Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad on the 2nd of July 2013, which is a follows:-
1. The consent judgement does not state an apology to be given to Wee Ka Siong by me as I have flatly rejected such suggestions by him.
2. Was without admission of liability by me.
3. There was no order as to cost.
4. Wee Ka Siong has no liberty to file afresh on the similar issue against me.
In short, Wee Ka Siong failed in his suit against me. In his press statement carried by The Star newspaper, which carried a story portraying and implying that I had apologised to him. - contrary to what was reported, I can say: That I merely express “REGRET” that Wee Ka Siong has misunderstood my various statements made over in the press as follows:-
In conclusion and looking back Wee Ka Siong should be grateful to me because I had invited him to come forward to explain to MACC and PDRM in the investigation of PKFZ issue. As a result, he was subsequently interviewed by MACC where MACC probe finds no proof of malpractice by Wee Ka Siong.
Please read with your open mind and for sure, at best, Wee Ka Siong can claim only a phyrrhic victory. One will have to ask where is the victory for Wee Ka Siong and where is the apology for Wee Ka Siong from Robert Phang.
1 comment:
Semua Ahli-ahli MCA Malaysia yang dihormati,
Segelintir pemimpin MCA seperti YIP KUM FOOK (lawyer, MCA Gombak) dan Yip Jiun Hann(pemuda MCA Gombak) perangainya sendiri pun tidak bermoral dan nama pun sangat busuk di Selangor. Khas nya di Kepong, Selayang, Rawang dan lain tempat, seperti makan wang SAMNAK SAMBODHI, DESA JAYA, KEPONG, merosakkan keluarga orang lain……..perangai sebegitu jahat.
Mereka cuba suruh kita menyokong Donald lim Siang Chai, sekira kumpulan ini bermenang dalam parti MCA, saya yakin parti MCA akan tenggelam selama-lama di Malaysia
Jangan kena jerat, sokong lah Saudara Dr Wee Ka Siong
SAMNAK SAMBODHI COMMITTEES
Post a Comment