15 Dec 2010

Nik Aziz, Wee Ka Siong cleared by MACC

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has cleared Kelantan Menteri Besar Nik Aziz Nik Mat of any wrongdoing over two graft allegations. The two involved Nik Aziz' haj pilgrimage trip which was sponsored by a local businessman and the appointment of his son-in-law Abdul Ariffahmi Abdul Rahmanas as chief executive for Perbadanan Menteri Besar Kelantan (PMBK).
On the haj offer, MACC's Operation Review Panel chairperson Hadenan Abdul Jalil said Nik Aziz had not "asked" (meminta) the company to pay for the haj trip costing RM65,000.

"Furthermore, Nik Aziz also did not go for the trip. The attorney general has scrutinised the case and no charge can be made," Hadenan said.Nik Aziz did not go for the haj last year, but made the trip this year.However, the seven-member panel headed by former auditor-general Hadenan noted there are weaknesses in procedures which must be rectified.

On the appointment of Nik Aziz's son-in-law Ariffahmi, Hadenan said the MACC's thorough investigations found that the menteri besar has the power to appoint any officers or staff.
“The appointment is seen as merely changing positions and under the PMBK enactment, the menteri besar has wide powers to appoint its officers and staff,” he said, adding the panel would like to advise state governments to improve their system, procedures and regulations in appointing officers.

Nik Aziz had been under fire last year in the appointment of Ariffahmi and also over the haj offer.

The operations panel is tasked to review cases of corruption or abuse of power which had been investigated by MACC but classified as 'no further action' needed.

The panel also cleared Deputy Education Minister Wee Ka Siong  over allegations of conflict of interest in holding a post in an architectural firm related to the Port Klang Free Trade Zone project.Wee, who had a stake in consultancy firm Hijau Sekitar Sdn Bhd, had denied the firm had worked on PKFZ. 

New evidence in probe on Tajudin 

Hadenan also denied claims that MACC was not taking action on former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) chief Tajudin Ramli.According to him, the investigations are still on-going, particularly after new evidence has emerged over the matter.

"Allegations that the MACC is not investigating are baseless as there is new evidence which has emerged and the MACC is looking into it," he said.

Asked as to whether the new evidence concerned what had been reported in the blogs, Hadenan stressed the matter is still being investigated.

Asked whether the attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail is also being investigated for not wanting to institute action against Tajudin, Hadenan decline to comment.

Tajudin is being probed over the purchase of MasKargo facility in Hahn, Germany, which resulted in huge losses to the national carrier.MACC had initiated investigations on Tajudin since 2002, and the Malaysia Today website operated by Raja Petra Kamarudin has alleged that the matter was put on cold storage on orders from Abdul Gani.

In 2002, MAS lodged its first of a series of police reports against Tajudin, who was executive chairman from 1994 to 2001, for causing the national carrier more than RM8 billion in losses.

This prompted a two-prong investigation by the police Commercial Crime Investigation Department and also the MACC. The CCID had recommended action, only for it to be shot down by the attorney-general.

This has led to speculations which were raised by Social Care Foundation chairperson Robert Phang Miow Sin , that records and pictures showed Abdul Gani to be close to an aide of Tajudin, which resulted in no action being taken.

Abdul Gani has however did not want to comment on the relationship or the haj trip which they shared together this year.

PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub had also called for the formation of a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the matter.

Besides Hadenan, the other members in the panel included Cecil Abraham, Nik Mohd Hasyudeen Yusoff, Walter Sandosam, Aminah Pit Abd Raman, Md Hamzah Md Kassim, Dr Syed Noh Syed Ahmad.

Also present was MACC director of investigations Mustafar Ali.

Source : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/150854

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Semua Ahli-ahli MCA Malaysia yang dihormati,

Segelintir pemimpin MCA seperti YIP KUM FOOK (lawyer, MCA Gombak) dan Yip Jiun Hann(pemuda MCA Gombak) perangainya sendiri pun tidak bermoral dan nama pun sangat busuk di Selangor. Khas nya di Kepong, Selayang, Rawang dan lain tempat, seperti makan wang SAMNAK SAMBODHI, DESA JAYA, KEPONG, merosakkan keluarga orang lain……..perangai sebegitu jahat.

Mereka cuba suruh kita menyokong Donald lim Siang Chai, sekira kumpulan ini bermenang dalam parti MCA, saya yakin parti MCA akan tenggelam selama-lama di Malaysia

Jangan kena jerat, sokong lah Saudara Dr Wee Ka Siong

SAMNAK SAMBODHI COMMITTEES

Anonymous said...

敬爱的佛教伩徒, 有关马來西亜,吉隆坡,甲洞帝沙再也 (暹寺) 三宝寺 Samnak Sambodhi Buddhist Association No.19-21 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong 52100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 所发生的纠纷, 经过阅读了,Venerable Phra Piya Thammo 和尚及叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook) 的双方书信之后, 再经实地旁听了觧,做为中间人,我要客观实事的说: 1.当一个和尚、初出道 (小学生),在修行, 若有缺点, 那是难免.他马华公会鹅唛區会主地席叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook),却心眼看不顺,就电招警万到耒佛教之圣地要扣畄和尚耒耻唇出家人, 这是绝对不许可, 除非是殺人放火之大罪悪. 2.他身为马华公会鹅唛區会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),却反其道而行, 在佛寺不依佛法而軽视佛教的精神, 以傲慢的手段,帶领一般黑社会的人耒挑衅和尚打架, 这也是不该有、更不是佛教修行者的行为. 3.佛教的圣地, 其主要的目地, 是让眾生修佛道, 不是政治争執的地方. 他马华公会鹅唛区会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 却利用佛教之圣地当政治活动的场所。如此果敢冒犯佛陀的教誨,更是大大的罪悪。 囯有囯章,彿有佛法,家有家规. 如果出家人有何不对之处, 他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 为何不向主持和尚投?让出家人自依和尚的條规处理、却强权一味要显示他是马华公会鹅唛区会及三宝寺理事会主席, 无法无天的应用霸道手段践踏佛教之圣地.为什么。。。。。为什么. 至今, 他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),不当不歉愧,还要狡辩, 这又证明了他说一套, 做的又是另一套, 囗是心非, 所谓的两舌, 相当阴险. 身为律师, 受高深教育, 却应用如此悪毒, 横蛮无礼的作风污辱和尚, 相等于是耻辱佛教伩仰者。他叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook)不向主持和尚投诉, 却自承英雄,电招外耒者.请问,身为將近20年的三宝寺主持和尚兼顾问,也是第一位 自筹建寺的大功臣,在大马南傳泒中,是闻名遐邇的高僧.其脸要放在那裡?同样的,要是台湾星雲大师的佛寺沙彌犯錯, 理事会没有礼貌自作主张,电招警方要扣畄其沙彌.我敢请问!星雲大师的自尊是怎样的感受?他叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook)是后耒者,担任理会主席也不久, 竟敢应用如此,目无尊長的方式对待住持,间接的就是告大家,强迫住持和尚必远離,雀巢鸠要佔。这种用心不良, 有老千之谋, 的确令人不敢恭维。 縱观以上几项重点,我不是盲目的護持三宝, 而是要坦白的说;他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook) 身受高深教育, 为律师者,本应通情达理才是,但遗憾的是, 却令人惊觉, 他厡耒就是彿书裡所讲的狡猾且残忍的此颣人。他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),利用他的专业知識, 懂得包裝自己的道德守則,以宗教为幌子手,到处募款,商业经营, 政治活动为重, 并没依循佛教宗教守则行事, 也没对人道作出任何貢献, 只不过借宗教之名捞取权和私利而己。 在此, 我奉劝, 他马华公会鹅唛区会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 好自为之, 免因果報应.
Sharing by Dr. Chew